Tuesday, April 19, 2011

what do you think of gay

what do you think of  gay



-I believe that there is a time and a place for everything and irrespective of sexual orientation, sexual activity in a public house is not one of them.

Edit.
I am not sure about that but I would think that if it was 'heavy' the answer would be yes.
People need to bear in mind that it is not so long ago that any homosexual behaviour in public was a criminal offence and punishable by a prison sentence, in fact I believe that overt sexual contact even between heterosexual couples in public is still considered 'lewd behaviour' by the police and punishable under the law

- Childish and self destructive actually, most people don't mind a peck but couples of any orientation snogging in public are enough to make most people squirm, by rubbing peoples noses in it this way they lose any sympathy from the public at large for the seemingly heavy handed way the publician dealt with the matter although from his point of view such behaviour at the time could well have sparked some disorder from any homophobic trogladites who may have been sitting in the pub at the time and the safety of
other customers has to be a factor.

A quiet word in their shell likes may well have sufficed.

- I think it was a massive over-reaction on the part of the pub staff to a couple kissing - a quiet word would have probably done the job.

And I think it's a massive over-reaction on the part of the gay campaigners which resulted in the John Snow pub closing early.

Perhaps if people actually talked to one another, instead of throwing people out of pubs, and organising mass kiss-ins .....


EDIT: Can 'Old Master' (aka Yerbury) really provide evidence for how 95% of the population thinks and feels? No, of course he can't!

Mr Yerbury - Nemesis, me? Surely not. But I will question unsubstantiated statistics like "95% of the population are repulsed by their behaviour". At least you understand that if you make the assertion it's your place to provide the evidence, not mine to provide proof which refutes it.

Some people are too stupid to understand that. Now, why on Earth would Redmonk feel the need to respond to the last statement? And what was he on about?

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110416023032AAUItQB

No comments:

Post a Comment